⛔ The content in these specimens is illustrative, except where it
names a real place — and those are sourced. The two place cards
carry the Paradesi Synagogue's real hours and a real Water Metro fare, each
stamped with where it was read and when. Everything else — the label/value
pairs, the "posted 10am, actually 11am" row, the sample prices — exists to
show a shape and names nobody. ⭐ There are deliberately two stamp
wordings and the difference is the point."Read from the
venue's own site" on the place cards, because that is what was done;
"We went and checked" on the contradicts row, because a posted
time can only be contradicted by somebody standing in front of it. That
row names no venue for exactly this reason — it demonstrates a state
without asserting a fact. ⚠️ A specimen that badges invented content as
checked teaches the badge to mean nothing, which costs more than the
specimen is worth.
How to tell whether you are reading Figtree. Both
woff2 files are now on disk. In the repo this kit carries them
inline; published, it links them from faces-figtree.css beside
it. ⚠️ If the words here look like Georgia or Helvetica, the faces did not
arrive — check document.fonts for Figtree:loaded
rather than trusting fonts.check(), which returns true for a
font that is absent and has done so on this project before. A missing face
does not look broken; it looks like a different, plausible design.
There is no photograph on this sheet. The two picture
boxes are dashed CSS rectangles standing in for the corner rule only. This
kit was written by an agent with no shell, which cannot copy a hundred
kilobyte base64 payload into a file. told_page carries a real
one. Nothing here should be read as a judgement about how photographs look.
Option B is set in Georgia, not in DM Serif Display. Same
genre — a high-contrast display serif — and not the brand face. It answers
the structural question, which is whether a serif masthead earns its place
at all. It does not answer how the real face looks beside Figtree.
Every number on this sheet is measured, and two came out against
the study that produced them. The claim that Airbnb’s
photographs are square was true of hero photographs and false of card
photographs. The claim that black on amber is two point four times more
legible than Airbnb’s button is true of pure black, and this system
ships a warm near-black, so the honest multiple is one point nine eight.